Journal - Cogito ergo sum
Total Articles 105
Last night over dinner I had an interesting conversation about being a professional baduk player. My company was two young and pleasant gentlemen, one from the US and the other from the UK. They said in America or Europe, “professional” indicates full time paid jobs. Also, no matter how skilled you are, if you love doing so but do not get paid for it, you are an amateur player. Concerning players who have other jobs but still play for a part-time job, people would call them “semi-professional”. It’s clearer if you think about the origin of the words. The word “professional” stems from “profession,” which means it’s your job. On the other hand, the “amateur” comes from the Latin “amatus,” meaning “love” or “having been loved.”
One example they used was professional tennis players. Tennis players don’t have special qualifying test to become professional, but they would be considered as professional if they perform in major matches and get paid for them. If they stop playing actively, however, they would be either semi-professional or retired professional. Also, the players whose full time job is teaching tennis may be considered as a kind of professional as well.
Being a professional player in Korea Baduk Association (also in Japanese, Chinese or Taiwanese association), however, is more like having a degree such as Master’s or Ph.D. It’s honorable and prestigious. Once you become a professional player, you are professional until you decide to retire. Yet, since no one has a right to tell you to retire, it would be safe to say that you are a professional for a life time. In fact, many players would retire only when they think their life is almost at an end.
Like almost every policy, the unique professional system of baduk has both good and bad sides. As a good side, it makes highly desirable to become a professional player. Though your income may not be stable, your status is secure. Also, it allows professional players to explore other worlds. For a good example, it would have been much more difficult for me to become a full time college student, if I had to give up professional status.
However, if you look at this from the baduk fans’ point of view, the system causes the professional world’s stagnation. Because players retire so late, KBA can afford to accept only a limited number of new professional players every year. It’s also true that many players believe that the strength of Korean professional players comes from the difficulty of becoming professional. Yet, the obvious consequence is that, many prodigies, who have as good of skills as the majority of professional players, end up giving up on their life dreams after several years of intensive study. It results in both diluting the competitiveness in professional tournaments and taking away places for “pure amateur players” in most amateur tournaments.
If I think only about my interests as a professional player, I want the current system would stay for a long time. As one baduk player who wishes prosperity for the entire baduk community, however, I want it to take the best for itself. What do you think? Is it good to keep the traditional system or should they reform regarding the new age?
One example they used was professional tennis players. Tennis players don’t have special qualifying test to become professional, but they would be considered as professional if they perform in major matches and get paid for them. If they stop playing actively, however, they would be either semi-professional or retired professional. Also, the players whose full time job is teaching tennis may be considered as a kind of professional as well.
Being a professional player in Korea Baduk Association (also in Japanese, Chinese or Taiwanese association), however, is more like having a degree such as Master’s or Ph.D. It’s honorable and prestigious. Once you become a professional player, you are professional until you decide to retire. Yet, since no one has a right to tell you to retire, it would be safe to say that you are a professional for a life time. In fact, many players would retire only when they think their life is almost at an end.
Like almost every policy, the unique professional system of baduk has both good and bad sides. As a good side, it makes highly desirable to become a professional player. Though your income may not be stable, your status is secure. Also, it allows professional players to explore other worlds. For a good example, it would have been much more difficult for me to become a full time college student, if I had to give up professional status.
However, if you look at this from the baduk fans’ point of view, the system causes the professional world’s stagnation. Because players retire so late, KBA can afford to accept only a limited number of new professional players every year. It’s also true that many players believe that the strength of Korean professional players comes from the difficulty of becoming professional. Yet, the obvious consequence is that, many prodigies, who have as good of skills as the majority of professional players, end up giving up on their life dreams after several years of intensive study. It results in both diluting the competitiveness in professional tournaments and taking away places for “pure amateur players” in most amateur tournaments.
If I think only about my interests as a professional player, I want the current system would stay for a long time. As one baduk player who wishes prosperity for the entire baduk community, however, I want it to take the best for itself. What do you think? Is it good to keep the traditional system or should they reform regarding the new age?
2011.07.04 15:53:28
Honestly, I'd prefer to see any player who wants able to compete for a spot in any major tournament. Obviously most current pros wouldn't like this. It's just like any exclusive and privileged club, the current members don't want to give up the privileges they already earned.
2011.07.04 15:55:32
Of course you'd have to have qualifiers but, at least let champions of important amateur competitions get a spot.
2011.08.08 15:04:00
I don't know. It's not as simple as it looks. If being a professional player doesn't mean much, I don't think many young players would work as hard to be one. It's not only about protecting professional players' rights, but also young prospective professional players' motivation and incentive of their hard work.
2011.08.21 19:05:19
Creating an age limit for being a professional player doesn't seem to be too bad an idea, but it would only be a temporary solution. For example, if you set the limit at 65 years and you make this limit retroactive so that all professionals 65 years and older must retire - I'm going to make up some numbers here - let's say there's 30 such players. This would create 30 free spots, so you might be able to add two spots for the next 15 years, but then the numbers become stable again.
Also, I believe what elementc suggests would not completely take away the motivation to work hard. If champions of 3 major amateur tournaments to play in professional tournaments, it would still be much better for them to become pro, since it would be much easier to enter a professional tournament than to win a major amateur tournament, not to mention other benefits that pros receive (e.g. salary, status, etc.).
It does seem that competition in Korea is incredibly fierce and players who completely deserve to become pro cannot pass the test, so I think that is a major problem. Perhaps you can set that retirement limit then hope that sponsorship rises enough so that you can continue having 2 extra spots for new pro players?
Also, I believe what elementc suggests would not completely take away the motivation to work hard. If champions of 3 major amateur tournaments to play in professional tournaments, it would still be much better for them to become pro, since it would be much easier to enter a professional tournament than to win a major amateur tournament, not to mention other benefits that pros receive (e.g. salary, status, etc.).
It does seem that competition in Korea is incredibly fierce and players who completely deserve to become pro cannot pass the test, so I think that is a major problem. Perhaps you can set that retirement limit then hope that sponsorship rises enough so that you can continue having 2 extra spots for new pro players?

